<label id="kuzok"></label>

  • 
    
    <span id="kuzok"><noframes id="kuzok"><label id="kuzok"></label>
  • <li id="kuzok"><tbody id="kuzok"><th id="kuzok"></th></tbody></li>
    <label id="kuzok"></label>
    <rt id="kuzok"></rt>
    <bdo id="kuzok"><meter id="kuzok"></meter></bdo>

    <center id="kuzok"><optgroup id="kuzok"></optgroup></center>
    撥號18861759551

    你的位置:首頁 > 技術文章 > 光學畸變比較

    技術文章

    光學畸變比較

    技術文章

    Comparison of Optical Aberrations

    Optical aberrations are deviations from a perfect, mathematical model. It is important to note that they are not caused by any physical, optical, or mechanical flaws. Rather, they can be caused by the lens shape itself, or placement of optical elements within a system, due to the wave nature of light. Optical systems are typically designed using first order or paraxial optics in order to calculate image size and location. Paraxial optics does not take into account aberrations; it treats light as a ray, and therefore omits the wave phenomena that cause aberrations. For an introduction on optical aberrations, view Chromatic and Monochromatic Optical Aberrations.

     

    After defining the different groups and types of chromatic and monochromatic optical aberrations, the difficult part becomes recognizing them in a system, either through computer analysis or real-world observation, and then correcting the system to reduce the aberrations. Typically, optical designers first put a system into optical system design software, such as Zemax® or Code V®, to check the performance and aberrations of the system. It is important to note that after an optical component is made, aberrations can be recognized by observing the output of the system.

     

    Optically Identifying Aberrations

    Determining what aberrations are present in an optical system is not always an easy task, even when in the computer analysis stage, as commonly two or more aberrations are present in any given system. Optical designers use a variety of tools to recognize aberrations and try to correct for them, often including computer generated spot diagrams, wave fan diagrams, and ray fan diagrams. Spot diagrams illustrate how a single point of light would appear after being imaged through the system. Wave fan diagrams are plots of the wavefront relative to the flattened wavefront where a perfect wave would be flat along the x direction. Ray fan diagrams are plots of points of the ray fan versus pupil coordinates. The following menu illustrates representative wave fan and ray fan diagrams for tangential (vertical, y direction) and sagittal (horizontal, z direction) planes where H = 1 for each of the following aberrations: tilt (W111), defocus (W020), spherical (W040), coma (W131), astigmatism (W222), field curvature (W220), and distortion (W311). Simply select the aberration of interest to see each illustration.

     

    Aberration Name (Wavefront Coefficient):

    Recognizing aberrations, especially in the design stage, is the first step in correcting for them. Why does an optical designer want to correct for aberrations? The answer is to create a system that is diffraction limited, which is the best possible performance. Diffraction-limited systems have all aberrations contained within the Airy disk spot size, or the size of the diffraction pattern caused by a circular aperture (Figure 1).

     

    Equation 1 can be used to calculate the Airy disk spot size (d) where λ is the wavelength used in the system and f/# is the f-number of the system.

     

    OPTICAL ABERRATION EXAMPLES

    After a system is designed and manufactured, aberrations can be observed by imaging a point source, such as a laser, through the system to see how the single point appears on the image plane. Multiple aberrations can be present, but in general, the more similar the image looks to a spot, the fewer the aberrations; this is regardless of size, as the spot could be magnified by the system. The following seven examples illustrate the ray behavior if the corresponding aberration was the only one in the system, simulations of aberrated images using common test targets (Figures 2 - 4), and possible corrective actions to minimize the aberration.

     

    Simulations were created in Code V® and are exaggerated to better illustrate the induced aberration. It is important to note that the only aberrations discussed are first and third orders, due to their commonality, as correction of higher order aberrations becomes very complex for the slight improvement in image quality.

    Figure 2: Fixed Frequency Grid Distortion Target

     

    Figure 3: Negative Contrast 1951 USAF Resolution Target

     

    Figure 4: Star Target

     

    Tilt – W111

     

    Figure : Representation of Tilt Aberration

    Figure 5b: Simulation of Tilt Aberration

    Characterization

    Image Has Incorrect Magnification

    Caused by Actual Wavefront Being Tilted Relative to Reference Wavefront

    First Order: W111 = Hρcos (θ)

    Corrective Action

    Change System Magnification

     

    Defocus – W020

     

    Figure 6a: Representation of Defocus Aberration

    Figure 6b: Simulation of Defocus Aberration

    Characterization

    Image in Incorrect Image Plane

    Caused by Wrong Reference Image

    Used to Correct for Other Aberrations

    First Order: W020 = ρ2

    Corrective Action

    Refocus System, Find New Reference Image

     

    Spherical – W040

     

    Figure 7a: Representation of Spherical Aberration

    Figure 7b: Simulation of Spherical Aberration

    Characterization

    Image Appears Blurred, Rays from Edge Focus at Different Point than Rays from Center

    Occurs with all Spherical Optics

    On-Axis and Off-Axis Aberration

    Third Order: W040 = ρ4

    Corrective Action

    Counteract with Defocus

    Use Aspheric Lenses

    Lens Splitting

    Use Shape Factor of 1:PCX Lens

    High Index

     

    Coma – W131

     

    Figure 8a: Representation of Coma Aberration

    Figure 8b: Simulation of Coma Aberration

    Characterization

    Occurs When Magnification Changes with Respect to Location on the Image

    Two Types: Tangential (Vertical, Y Direction) and Sagittal (Horizontal, X Direction)

    Off-Axis Only

    Third Order: W131 = Hρ3;cos(θ)

    Corrective Action

    Use Spaced Doublet Lens with S in Center

     

    Astigmatism – W222

     

    Figure 9a: Representation of Astigmatism Aberration

    Figure 9b: Simulation of Astigmatism Aberration

    Characterization

    Causes Two Focus Points: One in the Horizontal (Sagittal) and the Other in the Vertical (Tangential) Direction

    Exit Pupil Appears Elliptical Off-Axis, Radius is Smaller in One direction

    Off-Axis Only

    Third Order: W222 = H2ρ2cos2(θ)

    Corrective Action

    Counteract with Defocus Use Spaced Doublet Lens with S in Center

     

    Field Curvature – W220

     

    Figure 10a: Representation of Field Curvature Aberration

    Figure 10b: Simulation of Field Curvature Aberrationn

    Characterization

    Image is Perfect, but Only on Curved Image Plane

    Caused by Power Distribution of Optic

    Off-Axis Only

    Third Order: W220 = H2 ρ2

    Corrective Action

    Use Spaced Doublet Lens

     

    Distortion – W311

     

    Figure 11a: Representation of Distortion Aberration

     

    Figure 11b: Simulation of Barrel Distortion Aberration

    Figure 11c: Simulation of Pincushion Distortion Aberration

    Characterization

    Quadratic Magnification Error, Points on Image Are Either Too Close or Too Far from the Center

    Positive Distortion is Called Barrel Distortion, Negative Called Pincushion Distortion

    Off-Axis Only

    Third Order: W311 = H3ρcos(θ)

    Corrective Action

    Decreased by Placing Aperture S in the Center of the System

     

    Recognizing optical aberrations is very important in correcting for them in an optical system, as the goal is to get the system to be diffraction limited. Optical and imaging systems can contain multiple combinations of aberrations, which can be classified as either chromatic or monochromatic. Correcting aberrations is best done in the design stage, where steps such as moving the aperture s or changing the type of optical lens can drastically reduce the number and severity (or magnitude) of aberrations. Overall, optical designers work to reduce first and third order aberrations primarily because reducing higher order aberrations adds significant complexity with only a slight improvement in image quality.

    聯系我們

    地址:江蘇省江陰市人民東路1091號1017室 傳真:0510-68836817 Email:sales@rympo.com
    24小時在線客服,為您服務!

    版權所有 © 2025 江陰韻翔光電技術有限公司 備案號:蘇ICP備16003332號-1 技術支持:化工儀器網 管理登陸 GoogleSitemap

    在線咨詢
    QQ客服
    QQ:17041053
    電話咨詢
    0510-68836815
    關注微信
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产综合一区二区| 五月婷婷久久综合| 五月婷婷亚洲综合| 麻豆精品一区二区综合av| 亚洲精品国产第一综合99久久| 98精品国产综合久久| 小说区 图片区色 综合区| 婷婷五月综合激情| 天天狠狠色综合图片区| 伊人久久成人成综合网222| 亚洲色偷偷综合亚洲AVYP| 久久婷婷五月综合色精品| 六月丁香激情综合成人| 婷婷综合另类小说色区| 一本久道久久综合狠狠躁AV| 狠狠色丁香久久婷婷综合五月 | 狠狠色综合久色aⅴ网站 | 老色鬼久久亚洲AV综合| 亚洲狠狠色丁香婷婷综合| 久久综合视频网站| 天天久久综合网站| 国产91色综合久久免费分享| 久久综合伊人77777| 色综合久久天天综合| 伊人久久大香线焦AV综合影院| 亚洲国产欧美国产综合一区| 久久丁香五月天综合网| segui久久综合精品| 91精品婷婷国产综合久久| 国产婷婷色综合AV蜜臀AV| 国产成人综合日韩精品婷婷九月| 五月丁香综合激情六月久久| 激情综合一区二区三区| 伊人久久大香线蕉综合Av | 狼狼综合久久久久综合网| 久久九色综合九色99伊人| 天天爱天天做色综合| 狠狠夜色午夜久久综合热91| 国产婷婷综合丁香亚洲欧洲| 亚洲综合小说另类图片动图| 激情综合亚洲色婷婷五月APP|